R. v. Adwan
On the evidence and applicable law the mandatory minimum fine provisions of the Excise Act and Revenue Act do not meet the high threshold of gross disproportionality under ss.7 or 12 of the Charter; applicants failed to prove Charter breaches on a balance of probabilities, convictions are upheld and statutory penalties applied subject to suspended sentence/probation and payment accommodations.
- Citation
- 2021 NSPC 64
- Parties
- Prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: Bashar Mohammad Adwan; Defendant: Mohammad Alharoun
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing and Charter Motion Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; convictions affirmed; sentences imposed in accordance with statutory minimums and discretionary sentencing principles
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Minimums, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Sentencing, Contraband Tobacco, Charter S.7 and S.12
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Prosecution
Bashar Mohammad Adwan
Defendant
Mohammad Alharoun
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing and Charter Motion Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether mandatory minimum fines in the Excise Act and Revenue Act violate ss.7 and 12 of the Charter
- 2 What sentence is appropriate for convictions under s.121.1 Criminal Code, s.39 Revenue Act and s.32 Excise Act
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence and applicable law the mandatory minimum fine provisions of the Excise Act and Revenue Act do not meet the high threshold of gross disproportionality under ss.7 or 12 of the Charter; applicants failed to prove Charter breaches on a balance of probabilities, convictions are upheld and statutory penalties applied subject to suspended sentence/probation and payment accommodations.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; convictions affirmed; sentences imposed in accordance with statutory minimums and discretionary sentencing principles
Orders
- For each accused, suspended sentence and 12 months probation for the offence contrary to s.121.1(1) Criminal Code with statutory conditions and additional conditions including reporting to a probation officer within 48 hours and completing counselling and English/employment training
- For each accused, minimum fine under s.39(1)(a) of the Revenue Act of 134956.00 CAD with 180 days custody in default and three years to pay (additional time may be granted)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment