Bayer Inc. v. Canada (Health)

Bayer Inc. v. Canada (Health)

The Minister's interpretation of paragraph 4(2)(b) is correct; consequently Canadian Patent No. 2,194,979 does not meet the eligibility test for listing on the patent register and the appeal is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2010 FCA 161
Parties
Appellant: Bayer Inc.; Respondent: The Minister of Health; Respondent: The Attorney General of Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal From Federal Court Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Patented Medicines (notice of Compliance) Regulations, Eligibility Under Paragraph 4(2)(b), Patent Listing on Drug Patent Register
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Patent Law Health Law Regulatory Law Patented Medicines (notice of Compliance) Regulations Eligibility Under Paragraph 4(2)(b) Patent Listing on Drug Patent Register

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bayer Inc.

Appellant

The Minister of Health

Respondent

The Attorney General of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal From Federal Court Decision

  1. 1 Whether Canadian Patent No. 2,194,979 meets eligibility under paragraph 4(2)(b) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations
  2. 2 Whether the Minister's interpretation of paragraph 4(2)(b) is correct and should be upheld on judicial review
  3. 3 Whether any other eligibility rule applies

Ratio Decidendi

The Minister's interpretation of paragraph 4(2)(b) is correct; consequently Canadian Patent No. 2,194,979 does not meet the eligibility test for listing on the patent register and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs