Krawczyk v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co.
On the whole of the evidence, including the video, the defendant Riggs' manoeuvre was a routine slow backing to position his truck for a turn and did not demonstrate the requisite intention to create an apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact; therefore the assault claim against Riggs failed and claims...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2009 BCSC 164
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Betty Krawczyk; Defendant Employer: Peter Kiewit Sons Co.; Defendant Individual (truck Driver): Dean Riggs; Defendant Minister of Transportation: Kevin Falcon; Defendant Provincial Ministry: Ministry of Transportation; Defendant Public/private Partner: Sea to Sky Highway Investment Limited Partnership; Defendant Crown: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tort Action (assault and Vicarious Liability) / Application to Dismiss/strike Under Rules 18 a and 19(24)(a) (pre Trial Dispositive Motion)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's action dismissed against Riggs, Peter Kiewit Sons Co., Kevin Falcon, the Ministry/Provincial defendants; claim against Sea-to-Sky struck for no reasonable cause of action
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Vicarious Liability, Summary Judgment/rule 18 a, Strike Under Rule 19(24)(a), Incitement, Volenti Non Fit Injuria
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Betty Krawczyk
Plaintiff
Peter Kiewit Sons Co.
Defendant Employer
Dean Riggs
Defendant Individual (truck Driver)
Kevin Falcon
Defendant Minister of Transportation
Ministry of Transportation
Defendant Provincial Ministry
Sea to Sky Highway Investment Limited Partnership
Defendant Public/private Partner
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia
Defendant Crown
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort Action (assault and Vicarious Liability) / Application to Dismiss/strike Under Rules 18 a and 19(24)(a) (pre Trial Dispositive Motion)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Riggs committed an assault by intentionally creating apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact
- 2 Whether Peter Kiewit Sons Co. is vicariously liable for Riggs' conduct or directly liable as an employee‑owned company
- 3 Whether provincial defendants or Minister Falcon incited or are otherwise liable for the alleged assault
Ratio Decidendi
On the whole of the evidence, including the video, the defendant Riggs' manoeuvre was a routine slow backing to position his truck for a turn and did not demonstrate the requisite intention to create an apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact; therefore the assault claim against Riggs failed and claims against Kiewit, the provincial defendants failed derivatively; Sea-to-Sky's pleadings disclosed no reasonable cause of action and were struck under Rule 19(24)(a).
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's action dismissed against Riggs, Peter Kiewit Sons Co., Kevin Falcon, the Ministry/Provincial defendants; claim against Sea-to-Sky struck for no reasonable cause of action
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim against Dean Riggs dismissed
- Plaintiff's claim against Peter Kiewit Sons Co. dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment