MB0-06689
On the evidence the tribunal accepted the claimants' credibility, found a personalized risk from a declared blood feud and concluded Albania cannot provide adequate protection given documented systemic judicial weakness and corruption; no viable internal flight alternative exists, therefore the family are persons in need of protection under s.97(1)(b); the minor who is a US national failed to establish risk in the USA and her claim is rejected.
- Citation
- MB0-06689
- Parties
- Principal Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Spouse: XXXX XXXX; Daughter: XXXX XXXX; Daughter (minor): XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision Following Hearing
- Outcome
- Claims of XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX accepted as persons in need of protection under s.97(1)(b); claim of minor XXXX XXXX (US national) rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Blood Feud, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Well Founded Fear, Person in Need of Protection, Credibility
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Principal Claimant
XXXX XXXX
Spouse
XXXX XXXX
Daughter
XXXX XXXX
Daughter (minor)
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision Following Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the blood feud against the claimant's family gives rise to a risk amounting to persecution/serious harm
- 2 Whether the Albanian state can provide adequate protection
- 3 Whether an internal flight alternative exists
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence the tribunal accepted the claimants' credibility, found a personalized risk from a declared blood feud and concluded Albania cannot provide adequate protection given documented systemic judicial weakness and corruption; no viable internal flight alternative exists, therefore the family are persons in need of protection under s.97(1)(b); the minor who is a US national failed to establish risk in the USA and her claim is rejected.
Court Disposition
Claims of XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX accepted as persons in need of protection under s.97(1)(b); claim of minor XXXX XXXX (US national) rejected.
Orders
- Claims accepted for XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX under s.97(1)(b) of the IRPA
- Claim of minor XXXX XXXX rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment