R. v. McGonegal

R. v. McGonegal

Although the sentencing reasons were inadequate for not addressing some relevant factors (notably the guilty plea and rehabilitation), the Court concluded that the total sentences imposed were fit in all of the circumstances and the appeal was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2007 ONCA 788
Parties
Respondent: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN; Appellant: BRADLEY CARL MCGONEGAL
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; total sentences affirmed.
Legal Topics
Appeal, Sentence Fitness, Rehabilitation, Guilty Plea, Reasons for Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Sentencing Appeal Sentence Fitness Rehabilitation Guilty Plea Reasons for Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

BRADLEY CARL MCGONEGAL

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Sentence

  1. 1 Adequacy of reasons for sentence
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to consider the guilty plea and rehabilitative efforts
  3. 3 Whether the total sentence was fit

Ratio Decidendi

Although the sentencing reasons were inadequate for not addressing some relevant factors (notably the guilty plea and rehabilitation), the Court concluded that the total sentences imposed were fit in all of the circumstances and the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; total sentences affirmed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Appeal dismissed