Bartch v. Bartch
The court varied the without prejudice JCC interim order reducing monthly payments from $10,000 to $5,000 (retroactive to September 1, 2018) because the without prejudice nature permits reopening, two material changes occurred since the prior decision (further long adjournment of trial to June 2019 and a significant decline in claimant's income), and balancing hardships and policy considerations (risk of non-recovery by claimant and excessive interim burden) justified a reduction under the Family Law Act interim-order framework.
- Citation
- 2018 BCSC 1583
- Parties
- Claimant: Terry Lynn Marie Bartch; Respondent: Bradley Dean Bartch
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law (separation/financial Remedies) / Interim Variation Application (pre Trial)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; JCC Order varied to reduce monthly payment to $5,000 retroactive to September 1, 2018; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Variation, Without Prejudice JCC Consent Order, Separation Agreement Enforceability, Interim Distribution, Change in Circumstances, Access to Justice, Family Law Act Ss.216 217 and S.88
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terry Lynn Marie Bartch
Claimant
Bradley Dean Bartch
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law (separation/financial Remedies) / Interim Variation Application (pre Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a without prejudice JCC consent interim order requiring $10,000/month can be varied
- 2 Whether there has been a change in circumstances sufficient to vary an interim order
- 3 Whether the payments are spousal support or an interim advance of property and the court's jurisdiction under the FLA
Ratio Decidendi
The court varied the without prejudice JCC interim order reducing monthly payments from $10,000 to $5,000 (retroactive to September 1, 2018) because the without prejudice nature permits reopening, two material changes occurred since the prior decision (further long adjournment of trial to June 2019 and a significant decline in claimant's income), and balancing hardships and policy considerations (risk of non-recovery by claimant and excessive interim burden) justified a reduction under the Family Law Act interim-order framework.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; JCC Order varied to reduce monthly payment to $5,000 retroactive to September 1, 2018; no order as to costs.
Orders
- JCC Order varied to require claimant to pay respondent $5,000 per month (reduction from $10,000 per month)
- Variation is retroactive to September 1, 2018
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment