Crown Trust Co. v. Higher et al.
The commercial portion of the Trust Deed did not create a Quebec trust but an innominate commercial contract governed by general obligations; art.981i C.C. therefore did not shield the trustee from personal liability; the trustee breached its contractual obligation to apply subscribers' funds as promised (mortgage...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1977] 1 SCR 418
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Crown Trust Company; Respondents/plaintiffs: Oscar S. Higher et al.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 1975
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (trust/contract) / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Innominate Contract, Trustee Liability, Rescission, Damages, Misrepresentation, Interpretation of Civil Code Arts. 981a, 981i, 1065, Mortgage/hypothec Term
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crown Trust Company
Appellant/defendant
Oscar S. Higher et al.
Respondents/plaintiffs
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (trust/contract) / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether art. 981i C.C. shields the trustee from personal liability to subscribers
- 2 Whether the Trust Deed created a trust within the meaning of Quebec Civil Code or an innominate commercial contract governed by general obligations
- 3 Whether the trustee breached its contractual obligation to apply subscribers' funds as promised (mortgage amortization term)
Ratio Decidendi
The commercial portion of the Trust Deed did not create a Quebec trust but an innominate commercial contract governed by general obligations; art.981i C.C. therefore did not shield the trustee from personal liability; the trustee breached its contractual obligation to apply subscribers' funds as promised (mortgage amortization term), rendering it liable under art.1065 C.C. to reimburse capital and pay the promised 9% interest; the Court dismissed the appeals and upheld the damages remedy.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed with costs
- Upheld Court of Appeal judgment condemning appellant to reimburse capital payments and to pay interest at 9% per annum from January 1, 1968 to the respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment