R. v. Smith
The Court accepted the joint submission for a 24-month bare federal term as it was within the sentencing range established by local precedents and MacIvor; the Court imposed specific consecutive and concurrent short custodial terms across the dockets to total 24 months, declined to impose probation on release, recommended substance abuse counselling in the warrant of committal, and waived victim surcharge due to inability to pay.
- Citation
- 2013 NSPC 106
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Stephen McKeen Smith
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing Hearing Decision
- Outcome
- Sentence imposed: 24 months imprisonment (bare federal term).
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Probation, Cause a Disturbance, Section 145 Offences (aggressive Panhandling), Bare Federal Term, Consecutive and Concurrent Sentencing, Victim Surcharge Waiver, Recommendation for Treatment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Stephen McKeen Smith
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing Hearing Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to accept joint submission for a two-year bare federal term
- 2 Appropriate length and structure (concurrent vs consecutive) of sentence for multiple offences and probation breaches
- 3 Whether to impose probation on release
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted the joint submission for a 24-month bare federal term as it was within the sentencing range established by local precedents and MacIvor; the Court imposed specific consecutive and concurrent short custodial terms across the dockets to total 24 months, declined to impose probation on release, recommended substance abuse counselling in the warrant of committal, and waived victim surcharge due to inability to pay.
Court Disposition
Sentence imposed: 24 months imprisonment (bare federal term).
Orders
- Case #2657793: 6 months imprisonment (breach of probation)
- Case #2665485: 3 months imprisonment consecutive (s.175 cause a disturbance, summary)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment