R. v. McKenna
Because theft and breach of probation involve distinct criminal elements and protect different interests, and given the offender's extensive record, compulsive reoffending and low prospect of rehabilitation, the appropriate sentence is six months for theft plus twelve months consecutive for breach of probation (total 18 months), with applicable endorsements and victim surcharges; concurrent service to an existing sentence was ordered to account for remand time.
- Citation
- 2014 NSPC 99
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Randall Bruce McKenna
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to a total of 18 months' imprisonment (6 months for theft and 12 months consecutive for breach of probation); convictions recorded.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Probation, Theft, Concurrent Vs Consecutive Sentencing, Stare Decisis, Victim Surcharge
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Randall Bruce McKenna
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentences for theft and breach of probation arising from the same incident should be concurrent or consecutive
- 2 Appropriate length of imprisonment given offender's extensive record and need for specific deterrence
- 3 Whether prior court decisions bind this court (stare decisis) or whether 'judicial comity' applies
Ratio Decidendi
Because theft and breach of probation involve distinct criminal elements and protect different interests, and given the offender's extensive record, compulsive reoffending and low prospect of rehabilitation, the appropriate sentence is six months for theft plus twelve months consecutive for breach of probation (total 18 months), with applicable endorsements and victim surcharges; concurrent service to an existing sentence was ordered to account for remand time.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to a total of 18 months' imprisonment (6 months for theft and 12 months consecutive for breach of probation); convictions recorded.
Orders
- Six months' imprisonment for theft (s. 733.1 / s.354(1)(a) matter)
- Twelve months' imprisonment for breach of probation, to be served consecutive to the six-month sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment