Royal Trust v. Barter et al.
Breaches of trust by the former trustees were established; the estate is entitled to restitution equal to the loss and additional income the estate would have earned absent the breaches, totaling $528,460 as of May 31, 2000, together with declarations and proprietary remedies: the Times Square dividend is capital, Armstrong holds certain annuities and insurance in trust for the estate, a lien and sale order over the Langley property for the estate's 100/111 interest, surrender or charge over the Maritime Life policy, recovery of tax refunds, interest, and occupation rent; punitive damages and repayment of accounting fees were refused.
- Citation
- 2000 BCSC 1842
- Parties
- Plaintiff, Trustee of the Estate of Douglas Carson Smith: Royal Trust Corporation of Canada; Plaintiff, Income Beneficiary: Cherie Kissandra Smith; Defendant, Executor and Trustee: Robert Barter; Defendant, Executor and Trustee: Thomas Oliver; Defendant and Plaintiff, Executor and Trustee: Pamela Armstrong
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Trusts and Estate Litigation / Trial Judgment (reasons for Judgment)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff Royal Trust on breach of trust claims; award of restitution, proprietary remedies, declarations, liens, orders for sale and surrender, and interest; punitive damages and repayment of accounting fees denied; Cherie Smith awarded her 10% income share of calculated additional income ($16,680...
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Unauthorized Investments, Executor's Fees, Accounting and Passing of Accounts, Characterization of Dividend as Capital or Income, Set Off of Gains and Losses, Tracing and Liens on Land, Occupation Rent, Punitive Damages, Interest on Breaches
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Royal Trust Corporation of Canada
Plaintiff, Trustee of the Estate of Douglas Carson Smith
Cherie Kissandra Smith
Plaintiff, Income Beneficiary
Robert Barter
Defendant, Executor and Trustee
Thomas Oliver
Defendant, Executor and Trustee
Pamela Armstrong
Defendant and Plaintiff, Executor and Trustee
Procedural Posture
Trusts and Estate Litigation / Trial Judgment (reasons for Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees breached their duties and the extent of loss to the estate
- 2 Whether the dividend declared in the wind-up of Times Square Holdings Ltd. is capital or income for trust accounting
- 3 Whether gains on unauthorized investments can be set off against losses from other unauthorized investments
Ratio Decidendi
Breaches of trust by the former trustees were established; the estate is entitled to restitution equal to the loss and additional income the estate would have earned absent the breaches, totaling $528,460 as of May 31, 2000, together with declarations and proprietary remedies: the Times Square dividend is capital, Armstrong holds certain annuities and insurance in trust for the estate, a lien and sale order over the Langley property for the estate's 100/111 interest, surrender or charge over the Maritime Life policy, recovery of tax refunds, interest, and occupation rent; punitive damages and repayment of accounting fees were refused.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff Royal Trust on breach of trust claims; award of restitution, proprietary remedies, declarations, liens, orders for sale and surrender, and interest; punitive damages and repayment of accounting fees denied; Cherie Smith awarded her 10% income share of calculated additional income ($16,680...
Orders
- Declaration that breaches of trust by Barter, Oliver and Armstrong established and estate entitled to restitution
- Judgment for non-taxable capital receipts totaling $191,815 and additional income losses totaling $336,645, aggregate $528,460 (subject to accounting and tax adjustments)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment