Breese v. Amaro
- Citation
- 2020 BCSC 1234
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 20 August 2020
- Posture
- Civil Personal Injury (motor Vehicle Collision) / Application to Add Party (written Submissions Under Covid 19 Notice 14)
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 20 August 2020
- Posture
- Civil Personal Injury (motor Vehicle Collision) / Application to Add Party (written Submissions Under Covid 19 Notice 14)
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court granted the application because Groshok's participation was necessary under Rule 6-2(7)(b), no limitation period had expired and no prejudice to Groshok was shown, therefore the notice of civil claim was ordered amended and Groshok added as a defendant.
Court disposition
Application granted: Justin Edward Groshok added as a defendant and the notice of civil claim amended as sought; parties to bear their own costs.
Orders
- Justin Edward Groshok is added as a defendant in the action.
- The notice of civil claim is amended to the form attached as Schedule A to the notice of application.
- Each party shall bear their own costs of the application.
02
Material facts
Parties
Crystal Violet Kitto Breese
Plaintiff Counsel: R.M. MorganMaron Keith Amaro
Defendant Counsel: I. JungJustin Edward Groshok
Proposed Defendant03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Personal Injury (motor Vehicle Collision) / Application to Add Party (written Submissions Under Covid 19 Notice 14)
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether Justin Edward Groshok should be added as a defendant under Rule 6-2(7)(b) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules
- 02
Whether adding Groshok would cause prejudice or be barred by limitation periods
- 03
Whether the notice of civil claim should be amended and what costs order should be made
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The plaintiff submitted that Groshok was the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger and his participation is necessary to effectively adjudicate all matters; no limitation period has expired; there would be no prejudice to Groshok; seeks amendment of the notice of civil claim as per Schedule A and that parties bear their own costs.
- Respondent
- The defendant Amaro took no position on the application.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Supreme Court Civil Rules, Rule 6-2(7)(b)
Court may order that a person be added as a party where their participation is necessary to ensure all matters may be effectively adjudicated.
- 02
General principles of joinder and amendment; court discretion
In deciding applications to add parties the court considers limitation periods and whether prejudice would result from adding the party at the proposed time.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court granted the application because Groshok's participation was necessary under Rule 6-2(7)(b), no limitation period had expired and no prejudice to Groshok was shown, therefore the notice of civil claim was ordered amended and Groshok added as a defendant.
Obiter and limits
- Application was heard by written submissions pursuant to Covid-19 Notice 14 (revised July 20, 2020).
- The responding defendant took no position, which the court noted but did not make decisive.
Court disposition
Application granted: Justin Edward Groshok added as a defendant and the notice of civil claim amended as sought; parties to bear their own costs.
- Justin Edward Groshok is added as a defendant in the action.
- The notice of civil claim is amended to the form attached as Schedule A to the notice of application.
- Each party shall bear their own costs of the application.
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court of British Columbia · 20 August 2020
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Judgment· 20 August 2020
2020 BCSC 1234 Breese v. Amaro
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Breese v. Amaro, 2020 BCSC 1234 Date: 20200820 Docket: M188101 Registry: Vancouver Between: Crystal Violet Kitto Breese Plaintiff And: Maron Keith Amaro Defendant Before: The Honourable Madam Justice Adair Reasons for Judgment - Application by Written Submissions Counsel for the Plaintiff: R.M. Morgan Counsel for the Defendant: I. Jung Date of Plaintiff's (Applicant's) written submissions: July 13, 2020 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, B.C. August 20, 2020 [1] These are Reasons for Judgment in relation to an application brought by way of written submissions, pursuant to Covid-19 Notice 14 dated April 27, 2020 (revised July 20, 2020). [2] In this action, the plaintiff alleges that she sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident in April 2018, when a vehicle alleged to be owned and negligently operated by the defendant Maron Amaro collided with a motor vehicle alleged to be negligently operated by Justin Edward Groshok. The plaintiff says that, when the collision occured, she was a passenger in Mr. Groshok's vehicle. The plaintiff says that, as a result of the injuries, she has suffered loss and damage, including loss of earning capacity and special damages. Liability has been denied. [3] By notice of application filed July 20, 2020, the plaintiff seeks orders that: Mr. Groshok be added as a defendant in the action; the
notice of civil claim be amended to the form attached as Schedule "A" to the notice of application; and parties bear their own costs of the application. [4] In the application response filed by Mr. Amaro, he takes no position on the application. [5] Rule 6-2(7)(b) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules provides that the court, on application, may order that a person be added as a party if that person's participation is necessary to ensure that all matters in the proceeding may be effectively adjudicated on. The plaintiff says that, as Mr. Groshok was the driver of the vehicle in which the plaintiff was a passenger, his involvement in the proceedings is necessary. [6] As set out in the plaintiff's written submissions, no limitation period has expired, and there will be no prejudice to Mr. Groshok if he is now added as a defendant in the action. [7] I am satisfied on the basis of the material filed that Mr. Groshok should be added as a defendant and that the notice of civil claim should be amended to the form set out in Schedule "A" to the notice of application. I so order. [8] The parties will bear their own costs. "Adair J."
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.