R. v. Boudreau

R. v. Boudreau

On the totality of the evidence, including expert opinion that the appearance, shape and configuration of the door damage were inconsistent with a single sneaker kick and unresolved factual inconsistencies, the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed assault (s.266) or mischief/damage (s.430); the defendant was therefore acquitted on both charges.

Citation
2001 NSPC 5
Parties
Prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: Brian Boudreau
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
31 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Verdict
Outcome
Not guilty on charges under s.266 and s.430 of the Criminal Code
Legal Topics
Assault, Mischief/damage to Property, Expert Evidence, Forensic Evidence, Burden of Proof, Credibility and Witness Assessment
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Prosecution

Brian Boudreau

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial Verdict

  1. 1 Whether the Crown proved assault contrary to s.266 of the Criminal Code beyond a reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether the Crown proved mischief/damage to property contrary to s.430 of the Criminal Code beyond a reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Whether expert opinion and photographic/forensic evidence established causation of the damage

Ratio Decidendi

On the totality of the evidence, including expert opinion that the appearance, shape and configuration of the door damage were inconsistent with a single sneaker kick and unresolved factual inconsistencies, the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed assault (s.266) or mischief/damage (s.430); the defendant was therefore acquitted on both charges.

Court Disposition

Not guilty on charges under s.266 and s.430 of the Criminal Code