Sim v. Sim Estate
The Peachland property was not part of the deceased's estate because it originated with Mrs. Sim and passed by joint tenancy; the provable estate assets totalled $73,176.89; the London Life last-survivor policy payable to the plaintiffs constitutes adequate, just and equitable provision in the circumstances;...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2016 BCSC 1222
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Bryan Alexander Sim; Plaintiff: Gordon Anthony Sim; Plaintiff: Karen Aurelie Perchie; Plaintiff: Ronald Wayne Sim; Plaintiff: Sheila Marie Youngman; Defendant (executrix and Trustee): Betty Adena Sim; Defendant (personal): David Lyon Sim
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Wills Variation and Estate Trust Dispute / Trial Judgment (reasons for Judgment)
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed. Costs to defendants. Limited remedial order preserving plaintiffs' insurance benefit.
- Legal Topics
- Will Variation, Testamentary Disposition, Joint Tenancy, Life Insurance Beneficiaries, Unjust Enrichment, Breach of Trust, Accounting
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bryan Alexander Sim
Plaintiff
Gordon Anthony Sim
Plaintiff
Karen Aurelie Perchie
Plaintiff
Ronald Wayne Sim
Plaintiff
Sheila Marie Youngman
Plaintiff
Betty Adena Sim
Defendant (executrix and Trustee)
David Lyon Sim
Defendant (personal)
Procedural Posture
Wills Variation and Estate Trust Dispute / Trial Judgment (reasons for Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the will should be varied under s.2 of the Wills Variation Act to provide for adult children
- 2 Whether the Peachland property formed part of the deceased's estate or was held in trust
- 3 Whether the executrix breached trust or converted estate property
Ratio Decidendi
The Peachland property was not part of the deceased's estate because it originated with Mrs. Sim and passed by joint tenancy; the provable estate assets totalled $73,176.89; the London Life last-survivor policy payable to the plaintiffs constitutes adequate, just and equitable provision in the circumstances; accordingly the Wills Variation Act relief is not warranted and the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed, subject to an order preserving the plaintiffs' life insurance benefit.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed. Costs to defendants. Limited remedial order preserving plaintiffs' insurance benefit.
Orders
- Claim dismissed with costs to the defendants
- No accounting of what is owing to the estate ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment