C. D. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant did not identify any ground under DESD Act s.58(1) with a reasonable chance of success; the General Division's findings were supported by the record and the applicant's submissions amounted to an impermissible request to reweigh evidence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2017 SSTADEI 178
- Parties
- Applicant: C. D.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to Appeal Division (refused)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Misconduct, Leave to Appeal, Natural Justice, Standard of Review, Evidence and Credibility
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C. D.
Applicant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to Appeal Division (refused)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal has a reasonable chance of success under DESD Act s.58(2)
- 2 Whether the General Division failed to observe a principle of natural justice or erred in law
- 3 Whether the General Division made perverse or capricious findings of fact
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant did not identify any ground under DESD Act s.58(1) with a reasonable chance of success; the General Division's findings were supported by the record and the applicant's submissions amounted to an impermissible request to reweigh evidence.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused by the Appeal Division
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment