Permacrete Restoration Services Ltd. v. Myra

Permacrete Restoration Services Ltd. v. Myra

Liability was res judicata; the defects were non-structural (aesthetic) and repairable; reasonable measure of damages is cost to repair rather than replacement; the unsigned/perhaps undisclosed contract exclusion for freezing did not apply; the June 14, 1999 warranty applied; awarded repair allowance of $600 plus HST ($690), set off the $402.50 balance owing to claimant, declined costs and prejudgment interest, resulting in a net payment of $287.50 from Permacrete to Myra.

Citation
2005 NSSM 11
Parties
Claimant: Permacrete Restoration Services Limited; Defendant: Calvin Myra
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
30 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Decision
Outcome
Judgment in part for Defendant/Counterclaim; Permacrete Restoration Services Limited ordered to pay Calvin Myra $287.50 net.
Legal Topics
Damages, Repair Versus Replacement, Warranty, Setoff, Costs Discretion, Res Judicata
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Permacrete Restoration Services Limited

Claimant

Calvin Myra

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court / Decision

  1. 1 Whether measure of damages is cost to repair or cost to replace
  2. 2 Whether the contract exclusion for freezing applied
  3. 3 Whether the written warranty applied

Ratio Decidendi

Liability was res judicata; the defects were non-structural (aesthetic) and repairable; reasonable measure of damages is cost to repair rather than replacement; the unsigned/perhaps undisclosed contract exclusion for freezing did not apply; the June 14, 1999 warranty applied; awarded repair allowance of $600 plus HST ($690), set off the $402.50 balance owing to claimant, declined costs and prejudgment interest, resulting in a net payment of $287.50 from Permacrete to Myra.

Court Disposition

Judgment in part for Defendant/Counterclaim; Permacrete Restoration Services Limited ordered to pay Calvin Myra $287.50 net.

Orders

  • Order 1: Defendant, Calvin Myra, to pay Claimant, Permacrete Restoration Services Limited, $402.50 (balance owing on contract) to be set off against amounts owed by Claimant.
  • Order 2: Claimant/Defendant by Counterclaim, Permacrete Restoration Services Limited, to pay to Calvin Myra the amount of $690.00 plus HST, subject to the setoff in Order 1.