R. v. C.A.M.

R. v. C.A.M.

Acquittal because the Crown did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the impugned text messages amounted to 'counselling' for a sexual purpose under s.152; precise wording was uncertain and unreliable, and the requisite mens rea (intent or conscious disregard of substantial unjustified risk) was not established.

Citation
2010 NSPC 35
Parties
Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: C.A.M.
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
7 January 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal (s.152 Criminal Code) / Trial Judgment (acquitted)
Outcome
Not guilty (acquitted)
Legal Topics
Counselling Under S.152 Criminal Code, Mens Rea and Actus Reus, Text Message Evidence, Publication Ban S.486.4
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Crown

C.A.M.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal (s.152 Criminal Code) / Trial Judgment (acquitted)

  1. 1 Whether text messages constituted 'counsel' for a sexual purpose under s.152 Criminal Code
  2. 2 Whether the actus reus and mens rea for counselling under s.152 were established beyond a reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Interpretation and scope of 'counsel' (s.22(3)) and related jurisprudence

Ratio Decidendi

Acquittal because the Crown did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the impugned text messages amounted to 'counselling' for a sexual purpose under s.152; precise wording was uncertain and unreliable, and the requisite mens rea (intent or conscious disregard of substantial unjustified risk) was not established.

Court Disposition

Not guilty (acquitted)

Orders

  • Accused acquitted of s.152 charges
  • Other related charges dismissed