M. C. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The application for leave to appeal is refused because the claimant failed to establish an arguable case that the General Division breached natural justice or made perverse, capricious or unsupported factual findings about his availability; the General Division reasonably weighed the evidence and its findings were...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2019 SST 660
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: M. C.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to Appeal Division
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Availability for Work, Entitlement to Benefits, Overpayment, Natural Justice, Standard of Review for Findings of Fact
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. C.
Claimant/applicant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to Appeal Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the General Division failed to observe a principle of natural justice
- 2 Whether the General Division made erroneous findings of fact about the claimant's availability for work in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard to the material before it
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal is refused because the claimant failed to establish an arguable case that the General Division breached natural justice or made perverse, capricious or unsupported factual findings about his availability; the General Division reasonably weighed the evidence and its findings were supported by the record.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment