OS v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Leave to appeal was refused because the Appeal Division found no arguable error: the General Division properly applied the law, the decision that the claimant was not available for work was supported by evidence, there was no procedural unfairness, and the application did not raise an arguable factual or legal error...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2025 SST 284
- Parties
- Claimant: O. S.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance Leave to Appeal / Appeal Division Leave to Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Availability for Work, Entitlement to EI Regular Benefits, Procedural Fairness, Leave to Appeal, Error of Fact, Standard for Adducing New Evidence
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O. S.
Claimant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Leave to Appeal / Appeal Division Leave to Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the appeal have a reasonable chance of success under s.58 DESD Act?
- 2 Did the General Division commit a procedural fairness error?
- 3 Did the General Division make an important factual error?
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the Appeal Division found no arguable error: the General Division properly applied the law, the decision that the claimant was not available for work was supported by evidence, there was no procedural unfairness, and the application did not raise an arguable factual or legal error that could change the outcome.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal refused; appeal will not proceed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment