MS v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Leave to appeal was refused because the claimant identified no legal error and no provision in the Employment Insurance Act that permits extending a benefit period for being stuck overseas; therefore the appeal had no reasonable chance of success under the statutory test for permission to appeal.
- Citation
- 2022 SST 500
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: M. S.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance Appeal / Leave to Appeal (permission)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Benefit Period Extension, Eligibility for EI Benefits, Leave to Appeal, Statutory Interpretation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. S.
Applicant/claimant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Appeal / Leave to Appeal (permission)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the General Division erred by refusing to extend the claimant's EI benefit period due to being stuck overseas
- 2 Whether the claimant's circumstances fall within the statutory grounds for extending a benefit period under the Employment Insurance Act
- 3 Whether there is any arguable ground on which an appeal might succeed
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the claimant identified no legal error and no provision in the Employment Insurance Act that permits extending a benefit period for being stuck overseas; therefore the appeal had no reasonable chance of success under the statutory test for permission to appeal.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal refused; appeal will not proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment