W. N. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any arguable errors of law or fact within the statutory grounds for appeal, failed to comply with requests to particularize his grounds, and therefore the appeal had no reasonable chance of success under subsection 58(2) DESD Act.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: 2016 SSTADEI 234
Parties: Applicant/appellant: W. N.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Court: Social Security Tribunal of Canada
Jurisdiction: Canada
Judgment Date: 26 April 2016
Procedural Posture: Employment Insurance / Application for Leave to Appeal to Appeal Division
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics: Employment Insurance, Just Cause for Leaving Employment, Misrepresentation Penalty, Leave to Appeal
Source Language: english

Employment Law Administrative Law Social Security Law Employment Insurance Just Cause for Leaving Employment Misrepresentation Penalty Leave to Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

W. N.

Applicant/appellant

Canada Employment Insurance Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Insurance / Application for Leave to Appeal to Appeal Division

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appeal has a reasonable chance of success
2 Whether the General Division erred in law
3 Whether the General Division made an erroneous finding of fact in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

Application for leave to appeal refused

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.