FM v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The claimant failed to identify any arguable legal error by the General Division; he merely repeated previously considered factual and legal arguments and therefore the appeal had no reasonable chance of success, so permission to appeal was refused.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2022 SST 405
- Parties
- Applicant / Claimant: F. M.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance / Leave to Appeal (appeal Division Permission)
- Outcome
- Permission (leave) to appeal refused; appeal will not proceed.
- Legal Topics
- Employment Insurance Benefits, Insurable Hours, Leave to Appeal, Treatment of Application as Made Earlier, Promptness in Contacting Commission
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F. M.
Applicant / Claimant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance / Leave to Appeal (appeal Division Permission)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant raised an arguable case to obtain permission to appeal
- 2 Whether the claimant had sufficient insurable hours to qualify for EI benefits
- 3 Whether the claimant’s application could be treated as though made earlier given delay and severance pay
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to identify any arguable legal error by the General Division; he merely repeated previously considered factual and legal arguments and therefore the appeal had no reasonable chance of success, so permission to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Permission (leave) to appeal refused; appeal will not proceed.
Orders
- Permission to appeal is refused; the appeal shall not proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment