YW v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The claimant did not prove good cause for the entire 20-week delay because she relied on assumptions, failed to take reasonably prompt steps to verify her entitlement with Service Canada, and engaged in ordinary life activities (moving, parenting) that do not excuse the delay; therefore the application cannot be antedated to March 14, 2021.
- Citation
- 2022 SST 468
- Parties
- Appellant / Claimant: Y. W.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 3 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance / General Division Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Antedating, Good Cause for Delay, Eligibility, Reconsideration Review, Delay in Filing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Y. W.
Appellant / Claimant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance / General Division Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's EI application can be antedated to March 14, 2021
- 2 Whether the claimant had good cause for the 20-week delay in applying
- 3 Whether the claimant took reasonably prompt steps to understand entitlement and legal obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant did not prove good cause for the entire 20-week delay because she relied on assumptions, failed to take reasonably prompt steps to verify her entitlement with Service Canada, and engaged in ordinary life activities (moving, parenting) that do not excuse the delay; therefore the application cannot be antedated to March 14, 2021.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Claim cannot be antedated to March 14, 2021
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment