TS v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Leave to appeal is refused because the Applicant did not show an arguable case of jurisdictional error or an important error of fact: the General Division addressed the sole issue from the reconsideration decision (availability), applied the student presumption and the Faucher factors, and its key factual findings...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2025 SST 367
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: T. S.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance (ei) / Leave to Appeal to Appeal Division
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Availability for Work, Leave to Appeal, Grounds of Appeal, Jurisdiction, Error of Fact, Faucher Factors, Student Presumption
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T. S.
Applicant/claimant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance (ei) / Leave to Appeal to Appeal Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the General Division committed an error of jurisdiction in its decision
- 2 Whether the General Division made an important error of fact in finding the claimant not available for work
- 3 Whether the legal presumption regarding full‑time students and availability applies
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is refused because the Applicant did not show an arguable case of jurisdictional error or an important error of fact: the General Division addressed the sole issue from the reconsideration decision (availability), applied the student presumption and the Faucher factors, and its key factual findings are supported by the evidence and were not overlooked or misunderstood.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused; the appeal will not proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment