SD v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Leave to appeal refused because the claimant failed to show an arguable case that the General Division relied on false employer information or had a duty to investigate; the General Division reasonably preferred the employer's consistent evidence and there was no evidence of fabrication or procedural error as...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2020 SST 217
- Parties
- Claimant: S. D.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal (appeal Division) Refused
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Misconduct Disqualification, Leave to Appeal, Evidence and Credibility, Duty to Investigate
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. D.
Claimant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal (appeal Division) Refused
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is an arguable case that the General Division relied on false information from the employer
- 2 Whether there is an arguable case that the General Division failed in a duty to investigate the real reason for dismissal
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal refused because the claimant failed to show an arguable case that the General Division relied on false employer information or had a duty to investigate; the General Division reasonably preferred the employer's consistent evidence and there was no evidence of fabrication or procedural error as required under s.58(1).
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment