Canada Employment Insurance Commission v. D. D.
The General Division exceeded its jurisdiction by determining the insurability of employment and the quantum of insurable hours; pursuant to s.90(1) of the Employment Insurance Act only the CRA can make such rulings, therefore the General Division decision must be rescinded and the Respondent's appeal before the General Division dismissed.
- Citation
- 2017 SSTADEI 63
- Parties
- Applicant: Canada Employment Insurance Commission; Respondent: D. D.
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance / Appeal Division (leave Granted; Hearing)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; General Division decision rescinded; Respondent's appeal before the General Division dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Insurability, Insurable Hours, Jurisdiction, Standard of Review, Remit to Agency
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Applicant
D. D.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance / Appeal Division (leave Granted; Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the General Division erred in concluding the Respondent had sufficient hours of insurable employment under s.7 of the Employment Insurance Act
- 2 Whether the General Division exceeded its jurisdiction by determining insurability and the quantum of insured hours instead of referring the matter to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)
- 3 Whether the Appeal Division should defer to the General Division on questions of fact or law
Ratio Decidendi
The General Division exceeded its jurisdiction by determining the insurability of employment and the quantum of insurable hours; pursuant to s.90(1) of the Employment Insurance Act only the CRA can make such rulings, therefore the General Division decision must be rescinded and the Respondent's appeal before the General Division dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; General Division decision rescinded; Respondent's appeal before the General Division dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed; the decision of the General Division dated July 21, 2016 is rescinded; the appeal of the Respondent before the General Division is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment