Canada (National Revenue) v. Hagen
- Citation
- 2009 FC 510
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Federal Court
- Decision
- 15 May 2009
- Posture
- Income Tax Enforcement (writ of Seizure and Sale) / Motion to Extend Writ (judgment on Motion)
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Federal Court
- Decision
- 15 May 2009
- Posture
- Income Tax Enforcement (writ of Seizure and Sale) / Motion to Extend Writ (judgment on Motion)
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The writ was extended because it remained partly unsatisfied, substantial indebtedness remained outstanding, collection efforts had been unsuccessful, the debtor had realizable equity in property, and there was no opposition to the motion.
Court disposition
Writ of Seizure and Sale extended for a further six years from May 15, 2009.
Orders
- The Writ of Seizure and Sale is extended from this date for a further period of six years.
02
Material facts
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Minister of National Revenue
Plaintiff/crown Counsel: Brooke Sittler; John H. Sims, Q.C.Mr. Darren Hagen
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Certificate Amount (principal): CAD 183,361.85
- Outstanding Pursuant to Writ as of May 7, 2009: CAD 237,618.66
- Amount Collected by Setoff and Requirement to Pay: CAD 47,866.56
- Post Writ Indebtedness (2003 Tax Year) as of May 7, 2009: CAD 84,372.44
03
Procedural history
Posture
Income Tax Enforcement (writ of Seizure and Sale) / Motion to Extend Writ (judgment on Motion)
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the Writ of Seizure and Sale should be extended for six years
- 02
Whether the writ has been wholly executed
- 03
Whether outstanding debt, collection efforts and equity in property justify extension
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The writ forms part of the total indebtedness and has not been wholly executed; the total outstanding pursuant to the writ as of May 7, 2009 is $237,618.66; $47,866.56 has been collected by setoff and Requirement to Pay; the debtor has made no voluntary payments; collection attempts have been unsuccessful; the debtor has equity in property that could realise payment; the debtor has also accumulated new uncertified post-writ debt of $84,372.44; therefore the writ should be extended for six years.
- Respondent
- No counsel appeared for the defendant; no submissions or opposition were presented on his behalf.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Federal Court practice and enforcement principles under the Income Tax Act
A court may extend the validity of a writ of seizure and sale where the writ has not been wholly executed and the debt remains outstanding.
- 02
Registration practices under provincial land titles and personal property regimes and Income Tax Act enforcement mechanisms
Registration in the Personal Property Registry and Land Titles supports continued enforcement and priority of the writ.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The writ was extended because it remained partly unsatisfied, substantial indebtedness remained outstanding, collection efforts had been unsuccessful, the debtor had realizable equity in property, and there was no opposition to the motion.
Obiter and limits
- The debtor has accumulated new post-writ tax debt for 2003 which was not certified in Federal Court and did not prevent extension.
- The writ's registration history in the Personal Property Registry and Land Titles Registry supports continued enforcement.
Court disposition
Writ of Seizure and Sale extended for a further six years from May 15, 2009.
- The Writ of Seizure and Sale is extended from this date for a further period of six years.
Source and reliance status
Federal Court · 15 May 2009
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Federal Court
Judgment· 15 May 2009
Canada (National Revenue) v. Hagen Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2009-05-15 Neutral citation 2009 FC 510 File numbers ITA-4942-03 Decision Content Date: 20090515 Docket: ITA-4942-03 Citation: 2009 FC 510 Ottawa , Ontario , May 15, 2009 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore
IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX ACT - and -
IN THE MATTER OF AN ASSESSMENT OR ASSESSMENTS BY
THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE UNDER ONE
OR MORE OF THE INCOME TAX ACT ,
CANADA PENSION PLAN,
EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT AGAINST: MR. DARREN HAGEN 427 Scissons Crescent Saskatoon , Saskatchewan S7S 1C4
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER I. Introduction [1] This is a judgment in response to a motion brought by the Deputy Attorney General of Canada , on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Minister of National Revenue (Crown), to extend the Writ of Seizure and Sale from this date for a further period of six years. [2] Mr. Darren Hagen has not made any voluntary payment toward the amount outstanding pursuant to the Writ of Seizure and Sale since the Writ was issued. [3] Mr. Hagen has accumulated new income tax debt for the 2003 taxation year. As of May 7, 2009, the post-writ indebtedness of Mr. Hagen totals $84,372.44. II. Facts [4] On June 3, 2003, a Certificate was filed in the Federal Court certifying that Mr. Hagen, of Saskatoon , Saskatchewan , was indebted to Her Majesty for income tax arrears in the total sum of $183,361.85, together with interest, compounded daily, at the prescribed rate on the sum of $183,361.85 from June 4, 2003 to the date of payment (Certificate). [5] On June 3, 2003, this Court issued a Writ of Seizure and Sale directing the Sheriff at the Judicial Centre of Saskatoon to cause to be made the aforesaid sums from the lands, goods and chattels of the said Mr. Darren Hagen in his jurisdiction. [6] On June 12, 2003, the Writ was registered in the Personal Property Registry for Saskatchewan . [7] On July 7, 2003 and June 3, 2008, respectively,
the Writ was registered in the Saskatchewan Land Titles Registry. III. Issue [8] Should the Crown be granted an extension of the validity of the Writ of Seizure and Sale for a period of six years? IV. Analysis [9] The Writ forms part of the total indebtedness and has not been wholly executed. The Writ entails income tax debt accumulated for the 2001 taxation year. The total amount outstanding pursuant to the Writ as of May 7, 2009 is $237,618.66. [10] The total amount of $47,866.56 has been collected by setoff and Requirement to Pay and applied towards the outstanding debt. [11] Mr. Hagen has not made any voluntary payment toward the amount outstanding pursuant to the Writ since the Writ was issued. [12] Attempts to resolve the outstanding indebtedness of Mr. Hagen have been unsuccessful to date. [13] Mr. Hagen has an equity interest in property that could result in payment of his outstanding indebtedness secured by the Writ should the property be sold in the future. [14] Mr. Hagen has accumulated new income tax debt for the 2003 taxation year. As of May 7, 2009, the post-writ indebtedness of Mr. Hagen totals $84,372.44 and has not been certified in the Federal Court. V. Conclusion [15] For all of the above reasons, the Court grants that the Writ of Seizure and Sale be extended from this date for a further period of six years.
ORDER THIS COURT grants that the Writ of Seizure and Sale be extended from this date for a further period of six years. “ Michel M.J. Shore ” Judge
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: ITA-4942-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX ACT and IN THE MATTER OF AN ASSESSMENT OR ASSESSMENTS BY THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE UNDER ONE OR MORE OF THE INCOME TAX ACT ,
CANADA PENSION PLAN,
EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT v. MR. DARREN HAGEN 427 Scissons Crescent Saskatoon , Saskatchewan S7S 1C4 PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa , Ontario DATE OF HEARING: May 15, 2009 (by telephone conference)
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER: SHORE J. DATED: May 15, 2009 APPEARANCES: Ms. Brooke Sittler
FOR THE PLAINTIFFS No one
FOR THE DEFENDANT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE PLAINTIFFS No one
FOR THE DEFENDANT
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.