Canada Judgment

Federal Court

Canada (National Revenue) v. Hagen

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The writ was extended because it remained partly unsatisfied, substantial indebtedness remained outstanding, collection efforts had been unsuccessful, the debtor had realizable equity in property, and there was no opposition to the motion.

Court disposition

Writ of Seizure and Sale extended for a further six years from May 15, 2009.

Orders

  • The Writ of Seizure and Sale is extended from this date for a further period of six years.

02

Material facts

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Minister of National Revenue

Plaintiff/crown Counsel: Brooke Sittler; John H. Sims, Q.C.

Mr. Darren Hagen

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Certificate Amount (principal): CAD 183,361.85
  • Outstanding Pursuant to Writ as of May 7, 2009: CAD 237,618.66
  • Amount Collected by Setoff and Requirement to Pay: CAD 47,866.56
  • Post Writ Indebtedness (2003 Tax Year) as of May 7, 2009: CAD 84,372.44

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Income Tax Enforcement (writ of Seizure and Sale) / Motion to Extend Writ (judgment on Motion)

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The writ forms part of the total indebtedness and has not been wholly executed; the total outstanding pursuant to the writ as of May 7, 2009 is $237,618.66; $47,866.56 has been collected by setoff and Requirement to Pay; the debtor has made no voluntary payments; collection attempts have been unsuccessful; the debtor has equity in property that could realise payment; the debtor has also accumulated new uncertified post-writ debt of $84,372.44; therefore the writ should be extended for six years.
Respondent
No counsel appeared for the defendant; no submissions or opposition were presented on his behalf.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Federal Court practice and enforcement principles under the Income Tax Act

    A court may extend the validity of a writ of seizure and sale where the writ has not been wholly executed and the debt remains outstanding.

  2. 02

    Registration practices under provincial land titles and personal property regimes and Income Tax Act enforcement mechanisms

    Registration in the Personal Property Registry and Land Titles supports continued enforcement and priority of the writ.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The writ was extended because it remained partly unsatisfied, substantial indebtedness remained outstanding, collection efforts had been unsuccessful, the debtor had realizable equity in property, and there was no opposition to the motion.

Obiter and limits

  • The debtor has accumulated new post-writ tax debt for 2003 which was not certified in Federal Court and did not prevent extension.
  • The writ's registration history in the Personal Property Registry and Land Titles Registry supports continued enforcement.

Court disposition

Writ of Seizure and Sale extended for a further six years from May 15, 2009.

  • The Writ of Seizure and Sale is extended from this date for a further period of six years.

Source and reliance status

Federal Court · 15 May 2009

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Federal Court

Judgment· 15 May 2009

2009 FC 510

Canada (National Revenue) v. Hagen Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2009-05-15 Neutral citation 2009 FC 510 File numbers ITA-4942-03 Decision Content Date: 20090515 Docket: ITA-4942-03 Citation: 2009 FC 510 Ottawa , Ontario , May 15, 2009 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore

IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX ACT - and -

IN THE MATTER OF AN ASSESSMENT OR ASSESSMENTS BY

THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE UNDER ONE

OR MORE OF THE INCOME TAX ACT ,

CANADA PENSION PLAN,

EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT AGAINST: MR. DARREN HAGEN 427 Scissons Crescent Saskatoon , Saskatchewan S7S 1C4

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER I. Introduction [1] This is a judgment in response to a motion brought by the Deputy Attorney General of Canada , on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Minister of National Revenue (Crown), to extend the Writ of Seizure and Sale from this date for a further period of six years. [2] Mr. Darren Hagen has not made any voluntary payment toward the amount outstanding pursuant to the Writ of Seizure and Sale since the Writ was issued. [3] Mr. Hagen has accumulated new income tax debt for the 2003 taxation year. As of May 7, 2009, the post-writ indebtedness of Mr. Hagen totals $84,372.44. II. Facts [4] On June 3, 2003, a Certificate was filed in the Federal Court certifying that Mr. Hagen, of Saskatoon , Saskatchewan , was indebted to Her Majesty for income tax arrears in the total sum of $183,361.85, together with interest, compounded daily, at the prescribed rate on the sum of $183,361.85 from June 4, 2003 to the date of payment (Certificate). [5] On June 3, 2003, this Court issued a Writ of Seizure and Sale directing the Sheriff at the Judicial Centre of Saskatoon to cause to be made the aforesaid sums from the lands, goods and chattels of the said Mr. Darren Hagen in his jurisdiction. [6] On June 12, 2003, the Writ was registered in the Personal Property Registry for Saskatchewan . [7] On July 7, 2003 and June 3, 2008, respectively,

the Writ was registered in the Saskatchewan Land Titles Registry. III. Issue [8] Should the Crown be granted an extension of the validity of the Writ of Seizure and Sale for a period of six years? IV. Analysis [9] The Writ forms part of the total indebtedness and has not been wholly executed. The Writ entails income tax debt accumulated for the 2001 taxation year. The total amount outstanding pursuant to the Writ as of May 7, 2009 is $237,618.66. [10] The total amount of $47,866.56 has been collected by setoff and Requirement to Pay and applied towards the outstanding debt. [11] Mr. Hagen has not made any voluntary payment toward the amount outstanding pursuant to the Writ since the Writ was issued. [12] Attempts to resolve the outstanding indebtedness of Mr. Hagen have been unsuccessful to date. [13] Mr. Hagen has an equity interest in property that could result in payment of his outstanding indebtedness secured by the Writ should the property be sold in the future. [14] Mr. Hagen has accumulated new income tax debt for the 2003 taxation year. As of May 7, 2009, the post-writ indebtedness of Mr. Hagen totals $84,372.44 and has not been certified in the Federal Court. V. Conclusion [15] For all of the above reasons, the Court grants that the Writ of Seizure and Sale be extended from this date for a further period of six years.

ORDER THIS COURT grants that the Writ of Seizure and Sale be extended from this date for a further period of six years. “ Michel M.J. Shore ” Judge

FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: ITA-4942-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX ACT and IN THE MATTER OF AN ASSESSMENT OR ASSESSMENTS BY THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE UNDER ONE OR MORE OF THE INCOME TAX ACT ,

CANADA PENSION PLAN,

EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT v. MR. DARREN HAGEN 427 Scissons Crescent Saskatoon , Saskatchewan S7S 1C4 PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa , Ontario DATE OF HEARING: May 15, 2009 (by telephone conference)

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER: SHORE J. DATED: May 15, 2009 APPEARANCES: Ms. Brooke Sittler

FOR THE PLAINTIFFS No one

FOR THE DEFENDANT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE PLAINTIFFS No one

FOR THE DEFENDANT

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Income Tax Act

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Canada Pension Plan

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Employment Insurance Act

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.