Canadian Assn. of the Blind v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)
Costs were payable to the respondent on discontinuance under Rule 402; however items claimed in respect of two motion records were disallowed because the Court's interlocutory orders were silent as to costs, while units for the memorandum and assessment and a photocopying disbursement were allowed, resulting in the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2003 FCA 189
- Parties
- Appellant: Canadian Association of the Blind; Respondent: The Minister of National Revenue
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (revocation of Charitable Registration) / Assessment of Costs After Discontinuance
- Outcome
- Respondent's bill of costs partially allowed and assessed at $1,062.80 in favour of the respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Discontinuance, Interlocutory Motions, Federal Court Rules, Rule 400(1), Rule 402
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Canadian Association of the Blind
Appellant
The Minister of National Revenue
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (revocation of Charitable Registration) / Assessment of Costs After Discontinuance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a party against whom an appeal is discontinued is entitled to costs forthwith under Rule 402
- 2 Whether costs may be assessed for interlocutory motions where the disposing order is silent as to costs
- 3 Which items in the respondent's bill are allowable and the proper quantum of costs
Ratio Decidendi
Costs were payable to the respondent on discontinuance under Rule 402; however items claimed in respect of two motion records were disallowed because the Court's interlocutory orders were silent as to costs, while units for the memorandum and assessment and a photocopying disbursement were allowed, resulting in the respondent's bill being assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,062.80.
Court Disposition
Respondent's bill of costs partially allowed and assessed at $1,062.80 in favour of the respondent.
Orders
- Respondent entitled to costs pursuant to Rule 402 on discontinuance.
- Respondent's bill presented at $1,942.80 is assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,062.80.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Canadian Assn. of the Blind v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-04-14 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 189 File numbers A-444-01 Decision Content Date: 20030414 Docket: A-444-01 Neutral Citation: 2003 FCA 189 BETWEEN: CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE BLIND Appellant - and - THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS PILON Assessment Officer This is an appeal from the respondent's decision to revoke the registration of the appellant as a registered charity. The appeal was set down for hearing for December 18, 2002, however, the appellant filed a discontinuance on December 10, 2002. Under the provisions of Rule 402 a party against whom an appeal has been discontinued is entitled to costs forthwith. [2] Mr. Roger Leclaire, the solicitor for the respondent, filed a bill of costs on February 26, 2003 and requested that the assessment be done in writing. The Registry subsequently wrote to the parties with a timetable for the filing of written submissions. By letter to the Registry dated March 11, 2003 Mr. Leclaire advised that the respondent would not be filing any documents other than those already on record. On April 8, 2003 Mr. Gerard Thompkins, the solicitor for the appellant notified the Registry that he had not been able to obtain any further instructions from his client and that he would have no representations to make concerning the bill of costs. In the circumstances I will proceed with the assessment at this time. [3] The respondent claims 5 units for the preparation and filing of a Motion Record on September 27, 2001 and a further 3 units for its Motion Record filed on November 1, 2001. These two items cannot be allowed. Both Orders of the Court make no mention of costs. Where an Order disposing of an interlocutory motion is silent as to costs, the assessment officer is without authority to assess any. Rule 400 (1) provides that: "The Court shall have full discretionary power over the amount and allocation of costs and the determination of by whom they are to be paid." [4] Counsel for the respondent claims 5 units for the preparation and the filing of the memorandum of fact and law and 4 units for the assessment of costs. These two items will be allowed as well as the disbursement of $72.80 for photocopying court documents required to be filed under the Rules. [5] The bill of costs of the respondent presented at $1,942.80 is assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,062.80. Halifax, Nova Scotia April 14, 2003 François Pilon Assessment Officer FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE NO.: A-444-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: Canadian Association for the Blind v. The Minister of National Revenue ASSESSMENT IN WRITING WITHOUT THE PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF PARTIES ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS BY: François Pilon DATE OF REASONS: April 14, 2003 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Patterson Palmer Halifax, NS For the Appellant Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General Ottawa, ON For the Respondent