Montreuil v. Canadian Forces
The Tribunal dismissed the Commission's motion, holding that expert witnesses are generally permitted to be present during hearings and that co-signing a joint report does not create the exceptional circumstances required to exclude experts; any prejudice can be remedied by credibility findings.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2006 CHRT 56
- Parties
- Complainant: Micheline Montreuil; Commission: Canadian Human Rights Commission; Respondent: Canadian Forces
- Court
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights Complaint / Ruling on Motion to Exclude Expert Witnesses
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Expert Witness Exclusion, Witness Sequestration, Prejudice in Cross Examination, Credibility Findings
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Micheline Montreuil
Complainant
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Commission
Canadian Forces
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint / Ruling on Motion to Exclude Expert Witnesses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent's expert witnesses should be excluded from the hearing during testimony of other experts and the Commission's expert
- 2 Whether co-signing a joint expert report creates exceptional circumstances justifying exclusion of expert witnesses
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal dismissed the Commission's motion, holding that expert witnesses are generally permitted to be present during hearings and that co-signing a joint report does not create the exceptional circumstances required to exclude experts; any prejudice can be remedied by credibility findings.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed
Orders
- The respondent's expert witnesses may be present during all testimony by the complainant and the Commission's expert and during the testimony of their expert colleagues when called.
- The Commission's expert may be present during the testimony of the complainant and during the testimony of the respondent's expert witnesses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment