Montreuil v. Canadian Forces
The Tribunal granted the request because the identified witnesses were more comfortable testifying in English and because providing simultaneous interpretation for Dr. Beltrami's testimony was necessary to ensure the expert witness (Dr. Karmel) could understand all nuances and thus properly assist the Tribunal.
- Citation
- 2006 CHRT 55
- Parties
- Complainant: Micheline Montreuil; Commission: Canadian Human Rights Commission; Respondent: Canadian Forces
- Court
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights / Interim Ruling
- Outcome
- request granted
- Legal Topics
- Language Interpretation, Witness Testimony, Accommodation, Disability Discrimination, Sex Discrimination
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Micheline Montreuil
Complainant
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Commission
Canadian Forces
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Human Rights / Interim Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether simultaneous interpretation services should be provided for witnesses who prefer to testify in English
- 2 Whether interpretation should be provided for a witness to ensure an expert witness can understand and respond to that testimony
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal granted the request because the identified witnesses were more comfortable testifying in English and because providing simultaneous interpretation for Dr. Beltrami's testimony was necessary to ensure the expert witness (Dr. Karmel) could understand all nuances and thus properly assist the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
request granted
Orders
- Simultaneous interpretation services to be available during the testimony of Dr. Wilchesky, Dr. Karmel, Dr. Boddam, Dr. Newnham, Dr. Watson and Colonel Fletcher.
- Simultaneous interpretation services to be available during the testimony of Dr. Beltrami to facilitate understanding by expert Dr. Karmel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment