Canadian Waste Services Holdings Inc. v. Canada (Commissioner of Competition)

Canadian Waste Services Holdings Inc. v. Canada (Commissioner of Competition)

The motion for a stay was dismissed because the appellants failed to satisfy the three-part RJR-MacDonald test; the Court was not persuaded they met the threshold for granting a stay pending leave to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 190
Parties
Appellant: Canadian Waste Services Holdings, Inc.; Appellant: Canadian Waste Services Inc.; Appellant: Waste Management, Inc.; Respondent: Commissioner of Competition; Intervener: Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Motion for a Stay Pending Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
Outcome
Motion dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Divestiture Order, Leave to Appeal, RJR Mac Donald Test
Source Language
en
Competition Law Civil Procedure Administrative Law Stay of Proceedings Divestiture Order Leave to Appeal RJR Mac Donald Test

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Canadian Waste Services Holdings, Inc.

Appellant

Canadian Waste Services Inc.

Appellant

Waste Management, Inc.

Appellant

Commissioner of Competition

Respondent

Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Motion for a Stay Pending Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada

  1. 1 Whether a stay of the Federal Court of Appeal judgment and the Competition Tribunal divestiture order should be granted pending leave to the Supreme Court of Canada
  2. 2 Whether the appellants satisfied the three-part test for a stay established in RJR-MacDonald v. Canada (Attorney General)

Ratio Decidendi

The motion for a stay was dismissed because the appellants failed to satisfy the three-part RJR-MacDonald test; the Court was not persuaded they met the threshold for granting a stay pending leave to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Court Disposition

Motion dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Stay motion dismissed
  • No stay granted under s.65.1(2) of the Supreme Court Act