Wong v. Ontario

Wong v. Ontario

The Statement of Claim did not contain the words or facts necessary to support a claim for negligent investigation and therefore did not disclose a reasonable cause of action against the Crown; the appeal was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 ONCA 901
Parties
Appellant: Candy Wong; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario; Respondent: Home Trust Company
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
18 December 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Negligent Investigation, Statement of Claim, Pleading Sufficiency, Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Tort Administrative Law Negligent Investigation Statement of Claim Pleading Sufficiency Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Candy Wong

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario

Respondent

Home Trust Company

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the statement of claim discloses a cause of action for negligent investigation against the Crown
  2. 2 Whether the facts pleaded support a claim for negligent investigation
  3. 3 Whether the appeal from the motion judge should be dismissed and costs awarded

Ratio Decidendi

The Statement of Claim did not contain the words or facts necessary to support a claim for negligent investigation and therefore did not disclose a reasonable cause of action against the Crown; the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Partial indemnity costs to the respondent fixed in the sum of $3,500.00 inclusive of disbursements and GST.