Bolhuis v. Canada (Minister of Social Development)
The Court dismissed the judicial review because the Pension Appeals Board reasonably preferred the respondent's employer evidence over the applicant's account, made no error of law and did not unreasonably assess the facts; therefore there was no basis for intervention.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2005 FCA 147
- Parties
- Applicant: Carl Bolhuis; Respondent: Minister of Social Development
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review of Pension Appeals Board Decision / Final Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Pension, Termination of Benefits, Capacity to Work, Evidentiary Assessment, Credibility Determinations
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carl Bolhuis
Applicant
Minister of Social Development
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Pension Appeals Board Decision / Final Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Board erred in concluding the applicant was gainfully employed from January 1, 1985 to December 31, 1990
- 2 Whether the applicant remained disabled under the Plan during that period
- 3 Whether the Board made an error of law or an unreasonable factual assessment in preferring the respondent's evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Court dismissed the judicial review because the Pension Appeals Board reasonably preferred the respondent's employer evidence over the applicant's account, made no error of law and did not unreasonably assess the facts; therefore there was no basis for intervention.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Orders
- Judicial review application dismissed
- No costs awarded to the respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Bolhuis v. Canada (Minister of Social Development) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-04-28 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 147 File numbers A-423-04 Decision Content Date: 20050428 Docket: A-423-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 147 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: CARL BOLHUIS Applicant and MINISTER OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 20, 2005. Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 28, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. MALONE J.A. Date: 20050428 Docket: A-423-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 147 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: CARL BOLHUIS Applicant and MINISTER OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT NADON J.A. [1] The applicant was granted a disability pension in February 1978, with an onset date of August 1976. In March 1997, the respondent terminated his disability pension payments, on the ground that he was gainfully employed from January 1, 1985 to December 31, 1990. [2] The applicant challenged the respondent's decision and, on September 19, 2002, a Review Tribunal concluded that although the applicant had received income from employment in Barbados during the period of September 1984 to February 15, 1991, he was neither working nor capable of working during that period. Hence, the Review Tribunal held that the applicant's condition was disabling continually from 1976. [3] The respondent appealed the Review Tribunal's decision and, on July 27, 2004, the Pension Appeals Board (the "Board") allowed the appeal in part. The Board upheld the respondent's decision to terminate the applicant's disability pension payments and benefits. [4] The applicant, by his judicial review application, seeks an order setting aside the Board's decision. For the reasons that follow, I am of the opinion that his application must be dismissed. [5] The Board concluded, as it did, primarily on the basis of evidence from employees of Cave Shepherd & Co. Ltd., a large Barbados department store, to the effect that the applicant worked for Cave Shepherd in Barbados from September 10, 1984, until he resigned on February 15, 1991. More particularly, according to Mr. Alec R. McKenzie, Cave & Shepherd's Personnel Manager, the applicant worked at Cave Shepherd as an inventory control manager at the monthly income of US $1,500. Further, according to Mr. McKenzie, the applicant worked 40 hours per week and was absent from work from October 10, 1990 to February 15, 1991. [6] In response to this evidence, the applicant, although acknowledging that he had received the payments which Mr. McKenzie indicated had been made to him by Cave & Shepherd, testified, inter alia, that he was never employed by Cave & Shepherd. Rather, he was the beneficiary of a charitable gesture posed by the owners of Cave & Shepherd, Mr. & Mrs. Cave, who were long-time friends of his family. [7] Unfortunately for the applicant, the Board preferred the Minister's evidence over his and, as a result, concluded that he had regained the capacity to work during the period of January 1, 1985 to December 31, 1990. The Board also concluded that the applicant had failed to show that he was disabled within the meaning of the Plan during that period. [8] I have not been persuaded that, in so concluding, the Board made any error of law or any error in its assessment of the facts. Consequently, I see no basis for us to intervene. As counsel for the respondent indicated to us that he was not seeking costs, I would therefore dismiss the applicant's judicial review application, but without costs. "M. Nadon" J.A. "I agree. Marshall Rothstein J.A." "I agree. B. Malone J.A." FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-423-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: CARL BOLHUIS v. MINISTER OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: April 20, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. MALONE J.A. DATED: April 28, 2005 APPEARANCES: Mr. Carl Bolhuis Applicant on his own behalf Mr. Michel Mathieu For the Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: John H. Sims, Q.C. For the Respondent Deputy Attorney General of Canada