Bolhuis v. Canada (Minister of Social Development)

Bolhuis v. Canada (Minister of Social Development)

The Court dismissed the judicial review because the Pension Appeals Board reasonably preferred the respondent's employer evidence over the applicant's account, made no error of law and did not unreasonably assess the facts; therefore there was no basis for intervention.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2005 FCA 147
Parties
Applicant: Carl Bolhuis; Respondent: Minister of Social Development
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Pension Appeals Board Decision / Final Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed
Legal Topics
Disability Pension, Termination of Benefits, Capacity to Work, Evidentiary Assessment, Credibility Determinations
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Social Security Pension Law Judicial Review Disability Pension Termination of Benefits Capacity to Work Evidentiary Assessment +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Carl Bolhuis

Applicant

Minister of Social Development

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review of Pension Appeals Board Decision / Final Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the Board erred in concluding the applicant was gainfully employed from January 1, 1985 to December 31, 1990
  2. 2 Whether the applicant remained disabled under the Plan during that period
  3. 3 Whether the Board made an error of law or an unreasonable factual assessment in preferring the respondent's evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The Court dismissed the judicial review because the Pension Appeals Board reasonably preferred the respondent's employer evidence over the applicant's account, made no error of law and did not unreasonably assess the facts; therefore there was no basis for intervention.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed

Orders

  • Judicial review application dismissed
  • No costs awarded to the respondent