R v Brunswick

R v Brunswick

To trigger the higher maximum in OHSA s.74(1B) the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the omission underlying the offence was a significant contributing cause of the fatality; the Crown did not meet that burden for any of the offences; s.74(1B) therefore does not apply; convictions upheld and fines and education fund donations imposed: BECI Count 2 $40,000 plus 15% VFS; BECI Count 5 $40,000 plus 15% VFS and $10,000 to Education Fund (cumulative total $102,000 CAD); GEMTEC Count 11 $45,000 plus 15% VFS and $10,000 to Education Fund (total $61,750 CAD); NSP Count 16 $75,000 plus 15% VFS and $10,000 to Education Fund (total $96,250 CAD).

Citation
2025 NSPC 20
Parties
Crown: His Majesty the King; Defendant (employer): Brunswick Engineering and Consulting Inc.; Defendant (contractor): GEMTEC Consulting, Engineering and Scientists Ltd.; Defendant (contractor): Nova Scotia Power Inc.
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Occupational Health and Safety Act Offence Sentencing / Sentencing
Outcome
Defendants convicted of specified OHSA offences; s.74(1B) not triggered; fines and education fund donations imposed
Legal Topics
Causation, Sentencing, Victim Impact, Duty to Provide Rescue Equipment, Implementation of Safe Work Practices
Source Language
English
Occupational Health and Safety Regulatory Sentencing Administrative/regulatory Law Causation Sentencing Victim Impact Duty to Provide Rescue Equipment Implementation of Safe Work Practices

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

His Majesty the King

Crown

Brunswick Engineering and Consulting Inc.

Defendant (employer)

GEMTEC Consulting, Engineering and Scientists Ltd.

Defendant (contractor)

Nova Scotia Power Inc.

Defendant (contractor)

Procedural Posture

Occupational Health and Safety Act Offence Sentencing / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What legal standard and test apply to determine whether an offence "resulted in" a fatality?
  2. 2 Whether the Crown proved that the offence "resulted in" the fatality
  3. 3 What is the appropriate sentence for each offender?

Ratio Decidendi

To trigger the higher maximum in OHSA s.74(1B) the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the omission underlying the offence was a significant contributing cause of the fatality; the Crown did not meet that burden for any of the offences; s.74(1B) therefore does not apply; convictions upheld and fines and education fund donations imposed: BECI Count 2 $40,000 plus 15% VFS; BECI Count 5 $40,000 plus 15% VFS and $10,000 to Education Fund (cumulative total $102,000 CAD); GEMTEC Count 11 $45,000 plus 15% VFS and $10,000 to Education Fund (total $61,750 CAD); NSP Count 16 $75,000 plus 15% VFS and $10,000 to Education Fund (total $96,250 CAD).

Court Disposition

Defendants convicted of specified OHSA offences; s.74(1B) not triggered; fines and education fund donations imposed

Orders

  • BECI: Count 2 - $40,000 fine plus 15% victim fine surcharge
  • BECI: Count 5 - $40,000 fine plus 15% victim fine surcharge and $10,000 payable to the Minister's Education Fund