TB9-29860
On independent assessment the RAD concluded that the political reforms in Ethiopia since April 2018 are substantial, effective and durable for the purposes of assessing risk based on political opinion or imputed political opinion; the preponderance of evidence (including the USDOS report) shows opposition members are not being targeted and the admitted new evidence does not establish a serious possibility of persecution on a Convention ground, so the RPD's negative determination is confirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- TB9-29860
- Parties
- Principal Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Appellant Minor Child: XXXX XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal Under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision by Refugee Appeal Division Following Negative Refugee Protection Division Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD negative determination confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Change of Country Conditions, Well‑founded Fear, Admissibility of New Evidence, Deference and Standard of Review, Ethnic Violence, Political Opinion
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Principal Appellant
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Appellant Minor Child
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal Under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision by Refugee Appeal Division Following Negative Refugee Protection Division Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether change in country circumstances in Ethiopia removed a well‑founded fear of persecution
- 2 Whether new evidence submitted on appeal was admissible and material
- 3 Whether the RPD applied the correct legal test for change in circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
On independent assessment the RAD concluded that the political reforms in Ethiopia since April 2018 are substantial, effective and durable for the purposes of assessing risk based on political opinion or imputed political opinion; the preponderance of evidence (including the USDOS report) shows opposition members are not being targeted and the admitted new evidence does not establish a serious possibility of persecution on a Convention ground, so the RPD's negative determination is confirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD negative determination confirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed pursuant to paragraph 111(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
- RPD negative determination confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment