Armstrong v. Canada (Attorney General)
The Court found no reviewable error in the Applications Judge's decision and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2007 FCA 157
- Parties
- Appellant: Charles Frederick Armstrong; Respondent: Attorney General of Canada
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Applications Judge
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Standard of Review, Applications Judge Decision, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Frederick Armstrong
Appellant
Attorney General of Canada
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Applications Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applications Judge made a reviewable error
- 2 Whether the appeal should be allowed and relief granted
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found no reviewable error in the Applications Judge's decision and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Armstrong v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-04-17 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 157 File numbers A-236-06 Decision Content Date: 20070417 Docket: A-236-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 157 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: CHARLES FREDERICK ARMSTRONG Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 17, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 17, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SEXTON J.A. Date: 20070417 Docket: A-236-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 157 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: CHARLES FREDERICK ARMSTRONG Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 17, 2007) SEXTON J.A. [1] We are unable to find any reviewable error in the decision of the learned Applications Judge. [2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs. "J. Edgar Sexton" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-236-06 APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE CAROLYN LAYDEN-STEVENSON DATED APRIL 21, 2006, DOCKET NO. T-690-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: CHARLES FREDERICK ARMSTRONG v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: OTTAWA, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: APRIL 17, 2007 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SEXTON, PELLETIER, MALONE JJ.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SEXTON J.A. APPEARANCES: Daria A. Strachan FOR THE APPELLANT Elizabeth Richards FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Shields & Hunt Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT