Isman v. Sinnott

Isman v. Sinnott

Because the mortgages operated as independent charges under the Land Titles Act and the respondent had a valid personal covenant in the third mortgage, foreclosure and sale under the first mortgage did not discharge the mortgagor's liability under the third mortgage or the collateral mortgage securing it; the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
(1920) 61 SCR 1
Parties
Appellant: Charles Isman; Respondent: John Sinnott
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
21 June 1920
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Foreclosure, Collateral Mortgage, Priorities, Covenant for Payment, Sale Under Mortgage
Source Language
english
Property Law Mortgages Equity Foreclosure Collateral Mortgage Priorities Covenant for Payment Sale Under Mortgage

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Isman

Appellant

John Sinnott

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan

  1. 1 Whether foreclosure of a first mortgage and subsequent sale of the foreclosed property discharges a separate third mortgage and the collateral mortgage given to secure payment of that third mortgage
  2. 2 Whether a mortgagee who forecloses under a first mortgage and sells the property can still recover on the mortgagor's covenant in a separate third mortgage
  3. 3 Effect of the Land Titles Act regime (charges on land) on the independence of successive mortgages and remedies available to mortgagees

Ratio Decidendi

Because the mortgages operated as independent charges under the Land Titles Act and the respondent had a valid personal covenant in the third mortgage, foreclosure and sale under the first mortgage did not discharge the mortgagor's liability under the third mortgage or the collateral mortgage securing it; the appellant was not entitled to a discharge of the collateral mortgage until payment of the third mortgage.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs