Paterson & Sons Ltd. v. Lawrence Corp. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held the U.S. settlement/judgment was not conclusive against the non‑party charterer; Quebec law (including Code of Civil Procedure art.178) allows the charterer to raise defenses available under the law of the place of occurrence (including contributory negligence); the action récursoire accrued only upon final disposition of the principal claim and was timely; the release to the owner did not bar recourse by the owner against the charterer because the charterer was a primary debtor under the charter‑party. Accordingly the appeals were dismissed and the Court of Appeal's judgment was varied arithmetically to award $23,082.81 to Paterson.
- Citation
- [1974] SCR 31
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: N.M. Paterson & Sons Ltd.; Respondent / Defendant: St. Lawrence Corporation Limited; Claimant / Injured Third Party: Charles F. Gregory
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 1973
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal — Civil Action in Recourse Under Charter‑party (transportation/maritime) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Queen's Bench (quebec); Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross‑appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal judgment varied to increase amount payable to N.M. Paterson & Sons Ltd. to $23,082.81.
- Legal Topics
- Charter‑party, Dunnage, Unseaworthiness, Contributory Negligence, Lex Loci, Action Récursoire, Foreign Settlement and Foreign Judgment, Prescription Interruption, Release/res Judicata
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N.M. Paterson & Sons Ltd.
Appellant / Plaintiff
St. Lawrence Corporation Limited
Respondent / Defendant
Charles F. Gregory
Claimant / Injured Third Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal — Civil Action in Recourse Under Charter‑party (transportation/maritime) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Queen's Bench (quebec); Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a U.S. settlement/judgment is conclusive against a non‑party charterer sued in Quebec
- 2 Which law governs liability for the accident (lex loci) and availability of contributory negligence
- 3 Whether a release obtained from the injured longshoreman bars the shipowner’s recourse against the charterer
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held the U.S. settlement/judgment was not conclusive against the non‑party charterer; Quebec law (including Code of Civil Procedure art.178) allows the charterer to raise defenses available under the law of the place of occurrence (including contributory negligence); the action récursoire accrued only upon final disposition of the principal claim and was timely; the release to the owner did not bar recourse by the owner against the charterer because the charterer was a primary debtor under the charter‑party. Accordingly the appeals were dismissed and the Court of Appeal's judgment was varied arithmetically to award $23,082.81 to Paterson.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross‑appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal judgment varied to increase amount payable to N.M. Paterson & Sons Ltd. to $23,082.81.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Cross‑appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment