Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Houchaine
Summary judgment was granted because uncontradicted UAE travel records, institutional confirmations and related documents showed it was more probable than not that each defendant resided in Dubai for much of the relevant period and therefore made false representations or knowingly concealed material circumstances in their citizenship applications; the defendants failed to adduce specific evidence to raise a genuine issue for trial, their limitation defence failed, their request to discover a non-party was dilatory and unsubstantiated, and their s.7 Charter counterclaim did not raise a triable issue.
- Citation
- 2014 FC 342
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Boutros Naim Houchaime; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Jacqueline Mousa El-Skayer; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Lynn Boutros Hochaime; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Jennifer Boutros Hochaime
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Reference Under Paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Citizenship Act (citizenship Revocation) / Motion for Summary Judgment (no Trial)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment for the Minister: declarations that each defendant obtained Canadian citizenship by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances; defendants' counterclaim dismissed; solicitor and client costs awarded to Minister.
- Legal Topics
- Citizenship Revocation, False Representation, Fraud, Residency Requirements, Summary Judgment, Limitation Period, Charter S.7 Challenge
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Boutros Naim Houchaime
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Jacqueline Mousa El-Skayer
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Lynn Boutros Hochaime
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Jennifer Boutros Hochaime
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Reference Under Paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Citizenship Act (citizenship Revocation) / Motion for Summary Judgment (no Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether each defendant obtained Canadian citizenship by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances
- 2 Whether the Minister's reference is statute-barred by limitation statutes
- 3 Whether defendants raised a triable issue warranting discovery of a non-party immigration consultant
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment was granted because uncontradicted UAE travel records, institutional confirmations and related documents showed it was more probable than not that each defendant resided in Dubai for much of the relevant period and therefore made false representations or knowingly concealed material circumstances in their citizenship applications; the defendants failed to adduce specific evidence to raise a genuine issue for trial, their limitation defence failed, their request to discover a non-party was dilatory and unsubstantiated, and their s.7 Charter counterclaim did not raise a triable issue.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment for the Minister: declarations that each defendant obtained Canadian citizenship by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances; defendants' counterclaim dismissed; solicitor and client costs awarded to Minister.
Orders
- Declaration that Boutros Naim Houchaime obtained Canadian citizenship by false representation or fraud and by knowingly concealing material circumstances within the meaning of paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Citizenship Act
- Declaration that Jacqueline Mousa El-Skayer obtained Canadian citizenship by false representation or fraud and by knowingly concealing material circumstances within the meaning of paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Citizenship Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment