Montréal (City) v. Canadian Pacific Railway

Montréal (City) v. Canadian Pacific Railway

Because the applicant failed to obtain the leave required by section 41 of the Canada Transportation Act and did not comply with the statutory filing requirements, the Federal Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction to hear the application and the application for judicial review was quashed under paragraph 52(a) of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 105
Parties
Applicant: City of Montréal; Respondent: Canadian Pacific Railway; Intervener: Canadian Transportation Agency
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
27 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Judicial Review; Leave Required Under S.41 Not Obtained
Outcome
Application for judicial review quashed for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Under Canada Transportation Act S.41, Jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Appeal, Statutory Bar to Judicial Review, Quashing for Lack of Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Transportation Law Jurisdiction Leave to Appeal Under Canada Transportation Act S.41 Jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Appeal Statutory Bar to Judicial Review Quashing for Lack of Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

City of Montréal

Applicant

Canadian Pacific Railway

Respondent

Canadian Transportation Agency

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Judicial Review; Leave Required Under S.41 Not Obtained

  1. 1 Whether the Federal Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to hear the applicant's application for judicial review given s.41 of the Canada Transportation Act
  2. 2 Whether the applicant complied with the leave requirement and time limits in s.41 before filing a notice of appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Because the applicant failed to obtain the leave required by section 41 of the Canada Transportation Act and did not comply with the statutory filing requirements, the Federal Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction to hear the application and the application for judicial review was quashed under paragraph 52(a) of the Federal Court Act; no costs were ordered as the Court raised the issue sua sponte.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review quashed for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • Application for judicial review quashed for lack of jurisdiction.
  • No order as to costs.