Sauvageau v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

Sauvageau v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

The Tax Court judge correctly held he lacked authority to alter the Income Tax Act and that the claimed deductions were either not incurred or were personal expenses; accordingly the judicial review application fails.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2002 FCA 136
Parties
Plaintiff: CLAUDE H. SAUVAGEAU; Defendant: THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE; Defendant: THE MINISTER OF FINANCE OF CANADA
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 April 2002
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (appeal) / Appeal Reasons for Judgment
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Income Tax Act, Deductions, Jurisdiction, Personal Expenses
Source Language
en
Tax Law Administrative Law Judicial Review Income Tax Act Deductions Jurisdiction Personal Expenses

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CLAUDE H. SAUVAGEAU

Plaintiff

THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

Defendant

THE MINISTER OF FINANCE OF CANADA

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review (appeal) / Appeal Reasons for Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Court had power to alter the Income Tax Act
  2. 2 Whether the claimed deductions corresponded to expenses actually incurred or were personal in nature
  3. 3 Whether the grievance against the employer fell within the Court's jurisdiction

Ratio Decidendi

The Tax Court judge correctly held he lacked authority to alter the Income Tax Act and that the claimed deductions were either not incurred or were personal expenses; accordingly the judicial review application fails.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.