Montarville Land Co. v. Economic Realty Co.
The appeal was quashed because there was no amount in controversy of $2,000 and the matter did not involve title to the land or future rights therein within the meaning of s.46(b) or (c) of the Supreme Court Act, so the Supreme Court of Canada had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
- Citation
- (1916) 54 SCR 140
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Montarville Land Co.; Plaintiff/respondent: Economic Realty, Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 1916
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Motion to Quash Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
- Outcome
- Appeal quashed
- Legal Topics
- Cloud on Title, Mortgage Discharge, Jurisdiction Under Supreme Court Act S.46, Deferred Instalments, Warranty of Title
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Montarville Land Co.
Defendant/appellant
Economic Realty, Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Motion to Quash Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court of Canada had jurisdiction under s.46(b) or (c) of the Supreme Court Act
- 2 Whether there was an amount in controversy of $2,000 or more
- 3 Whether the dispute involved title to land or future rights in land that could bind third parties
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was quashed because there was no amount in controversy of $2,000 and the matter did not involve title to the land or future rights therein within the meaning of s.46(b) or (c) of the Supreme Court Act, so the Supreme Court of Canada had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal quashed
Orders
- Appeal quashed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment