Club juridique v. Canada (Attorney General)

Club juridique v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Tax Court judge properly applied the governing criteria and, on the evidence, correctly concluded that the relationship was a contract of service making Ms. Charest's employment insurable under subsection 5(1) of the Employment Insurance Act; there was no reviewable error and the application for judicial review...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 414
Parties
Applicant: Club Juridique; Respondent: The Attorney General of Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
4 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Tax Court Judgment (judicial Review) / Final Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Insurable Employment, Contract of Service Vs Contract for Services, Judicial Review, Association by Contract of Service
Source Language
en
Employment Insurance Administrative Law Tax Insurable Employment Contract of Service Vs Contract for Services Judicial Review Association by Contract of Service

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Club Juridique

Applicant

The Attorney General of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Tax Court Judgment (judicial Review) / Final Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the applicant and Solange Charest were associated by a contract of service
  2. 2 Whether Ms. Charest's employment from May 1, 1995 to February 18, 2000 was insurable under subsection 5(1) of the Employment Insurance Act
  3. 3 Whether the Tax Court judge correctly applied the legal criteria to distinguish contract of service from contract for services

Ratio Decidendi

The Tax Court judge properly applied the governing criteria and, on the evidence, correctly concluded that the relationship was a contract of service making Ms. Charest's employment insurable under subsection 5(1) of the Employment Insurance Act; there was no reviewable error and the application for judicial review must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed with costs