Reade v. 22 King Street West Inc.

Reade v. 22 King Street West Inc.

The appeal was dismissed as abandoned because the appellant failed to appear or prosecute the appeal; the respondent was awarded costs of $500.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
C38664
Parties
Plaintiff: Colin M. Reade; Defendant: 22 King Street West Inc; Defendant: Masood Vatandoust; Defendant: Gordon Fallis; Plaintiff by Counterclaim/appellant: Gordon Fallis; Defendant to the Counterclaim/respondent: Colin M. Reade
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
29 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Hearing; Appeal Dismissed as Abandoned
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as abandoned
Legal Topics
Abandoned Appeal, Bankruptcy of Respondent, Costs, Dismissal for Abandonment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Bankruptcy Appeal Costs Abandoned Appeal Bankruptcy of Respondent Dismissal for Abandonment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Colin M. Reade

Plaintiff

22 King Street West Inc

Defendant

Masood Vatandoust

Defendant

Gordon Fallis

Defendant

Gordon Fallis

Plaintiff by Counterclaim/appellant

Colin M. Reade

Defendant to the Counterclaim/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Hearing; Appeal Dismissed as Abandoned

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed as abandoned due to non‑prosecution by the appellant
  2. 2 What costs order, if any, should be made

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as abandoned because the appellant failed to appear or prosecute the appeal; the respondent was awarded costs of $500.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as abandoned

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed as abandoned.
  • Costs to the respondent Reade fixed at $500.