Quebecor/Videotron - Scheduling Order (Professional English translation, not revised)
Under the authority of the Competition Tribunal Rules s.79 and having consulted the parties, the Tribunal set deadlines for intervention and replies, scheduled a pre-hearing conference and fixed the hearing date to ensure orderly disposition of the consent application under ss.92 and 105 of the Competition Act.
- Citation
- 2000 Comp Trib 23
- Parties
- Applicant: Commissioner of Competition; Respondent: Quebecor Inc.
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Registered Consent Agreement (mergers) / Scheduling Order
- Outcome
- Scheduling order issued: intervention deadline set, reply timelines fixed, pre-hearing conference and hearing date scheduled.
- Legal Topics
- Consent Order, Intervention, Hearing Scheduling, Pre Hearing Conference
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Competition
Applicant
Quebecor Inc.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Registered Consent Agreement (mergers) / Scheduling Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a registered consent order under ss.92 and 105 of the Competition Act
- 2 Procedural management of applications for leave to intervene
- 3 Establishment of deadlines for filing comments and replies
Ratio Decidendi
Under the authority of the Competition Tribunal Rules s.79 and having consulted the parties, the Tribunal set deadlines for intervention and replies, scheduled a pre-hearing conference and fixed the hearing date to ensure orderly disposition of the consent application under ss.92 and 105 of the Competition Act.
Court Disposition
Scheduling order issued: intervention deadline set, reply timelines fixed, pre-hearing conference and hearing date scheduled.
Orders
- Deadline to file applications for leave to intervene and any comments: December 18, 2000.
- Commissioner must, and the Respondent may, serve and file replies to comments and responses to applications for leave to intervene within seven days after the expiration of the time for filing comments or applications for leave to intervene.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment