Rogers - Shaw - Scheduling Order (s.104)

Rogers - Shaw - Scheduling Order (s.104)

The Tribunal concluded the proposed schedule was appropriate and consistent with the Timelines Practice Direction and the duty in s.9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act, and therefore issued a scheduling order setting specific deadlines and hearing dates for the Commissioner’s s.104 application.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2022 Comp Trib 4
Parties
Applicant: Commissioner of Competition; Respondent: Rogers Communications Inc.; Respondent: Shaw Communications Inc.
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
18 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Interim Order (mergers) S.104 Application / Scheduling / Case Management Prior to Hearing
Outcome
Scheduling order issued setting timetable for the Commissioner’s s.104 interim application
Legal Topics
Interim Relief, S.104 of the Competition Act, S.92 Application, Scheduling, Case Management, Timelines Practice Direction
Source Language
english
Competition Law Merger Review Procedural Law Interim Relief S.104 of the Competition Act S.92 Application Scheduling Case Management +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commissioner of Competition

Applicant

Rogers Communications Inc.

Respondent

Shaw Communications Inc.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interim Order (mergers) S.104 Application / Scheduling / Case Management Prior to Hearing

  1. 1 Whether a timetable for the Commissioner’s s.104 interim application is appropriate
  2. 2 Whether the proposed schedule accords with the Timelines Practice Direction
  3. 3 Whether the schedule respects the expeditious and fair disposition duty in subsection 9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal concluded the proposed schedule was appropriate and consistent with the Timelines Practice Direction and the duty in s.9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act, and therefore issued a scheduling order setting specific deadlines and hearing dates for the Commissioner’s s.104 application.

Court Disposition

Scheduling order issued setting timetable for the Commissioner’s s.104 interim application

Orders

  • Respondents to file their Responses to the application under section 104 and responding application records by Tuesday, May 31, 2022
  • Parties to identify witnesses for cross-examination, except Reply witnesses, by Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at the latest