Saskatchewan Wheat Pool and JRI - Order during a case management teleconference of November 17, 2006 rescinding the Scheduling Order of June 19, 2006 and setting a date for a scheduling conference
The Tribunal rescinded the Scheduling Order because the incomplete Trustee Sale and announced potential ownership changes constitute compelling reasons that would make presently scheduled oral discoveries likely to require costly reattendances; therefore the Schedule was rescinded and a further scheduling conference...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2006 Comp Trib 39
- Parties
- Applicant: Commissioner of Competition; Respondent: Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.; Respondent: 6362681 Canada Ltd.; Respondent: 6362699 Canada Ltd.; Respondent: James Richardson International Limited; Intervenor: Canadian National Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian Pacific Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian Wheat Board; Intervenor: Vancouver Port Authority
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Order (mergers) / Case Management Teleconference; Rescission of Scheduling Order; Scheduling Conference Set
- Outcome
- Scheduling Order of June 19, 2006 rescinded; scheduling conference set for January 30, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. (EST); parties ordered to file proposed schedules by January 26, 2007.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Order, Section 92 Application, Scheduling, Discovery, Divestiture
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Competition
Applicant
Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.
Respondent
6362681 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
6362699 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
James Richardson International Limited
Respondent
Canadian National Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian Wheat Board
Intervenor
Vancouver Port Authority
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Interim Order (mergers) / Case Management Teleconference; Rescission of Scheduling Order; Scheduling Conference Set
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Scheduling Order should be rescinded because ongoing Trustee Sale and potential ownership changes would render current discovery duplicative and costly
- 2 Whether a postponement of oral discoveries is justified to avoid undue expense of reattendances
- 3 Whether compelling reasons exist to alter the case management timetable under Tribunal authority
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal rescinded the Scheduling Order because the incomplete Trustee Sale and announced potential ownership changes constitute compelling reasons that would make presently scheduled oral discoveries likely to require costly reattendances; therefore the Schedule was rescinded and a further scheduling conference was set to establish a new timetable once those developments are resolved.
Court Disposition
Scheduling Order of June 19, 2006 rescinded; scheduling conference set for January 30, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. (EST); parties ordered to file proposed schedules by January 26, 2007.
Orders
- The Scheduling Order of June 19, 2006 is rescinded.
- A scheduling conference by conference call will be held on January 30, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. (EST).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment