Saskatchewan Wheat Pool and JRI - Scheduling Order (for hearing starting January 15, 2008 in Vancouver)
Because the Commissioner, the Respondents and the Intervenors all accepted the Tribunal's proposed schedule, the Tribunal exercised its procedural authority under the Competition Act to adopt the proposed schedule and issue a scheduling order setting the hearing date and pre-hearing deadlines.
- Citation
- 2007 Comp Trib 12
- Parties
- Applicant: Commissioner of Competition; Respondent: Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.; Respondent: 6362681 Canada Ltd.; Respondent: 6362699 Canada Ltd.; Respondent: James Richardson International Limited; Intervenor: Canadian Pacific Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian National Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian Wheat Board; Intervenor: Vancouver Port Authority
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Order (mergers) / Scheduling Order; Pre Hearing
- Outcome
- Scheduling order issued; Tribunal's proposed schedule adopted and hearing set to commence January 15, 2008 in Vancouver, with fixed pre-hearing and hearing dates.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Order, Section 92 Application, Joint Venture, Port Terminal Grain Handling, Scheduling Order
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Competition
Applicant
Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.
Respondent
6362681 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
6362699 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
James Richardson International Limited
Respondent
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian National Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian Wheat Board
Intervenor
Vancouver Port Authority
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Interim Order (mergers) / Scheduling Order; Pre Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal should adopt the proposed schedule for disposition of the s.92 application
- 2 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to set procedural timelines for affidavits, discoveries, expert reports and motions
- 3 Allocation of hearing time and case management procedures
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Commissioner, the Respondents and the Intervenors all accepted the Tribunal's proposed schedule, the Tribunal exercised its procedural authority under the Competition Act to adopt the proposed schedule and issue a scheduling order setting the hearing date and pre-hearing deadlines.
Court Disposition
Scheduling order issued; Tribunal's proposed schedule adopted and hearing set to commence January 15, 2008 in Vancouver, with fixed pre-hearing and hearing dates.
Orders
- Hearing to commence Tuesday, January 15, 2008 in Vancouver, British Columbia
- Schedule of pre-hearing procedures and deadlines established (affidavits of documents, oral discoveries, undertakings, will-say statements, expert reports, motions deadlines) as set out in the order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment