Saskatchewan Wheat Pool and JRI - Order rescinding the Scheduling Order of April 30, 2007
The Tribunal rescinded the Scheduling Order because intervening commercial and procedural developments (the consent agreement envisioning termination of the joint venture, AU board recommendation to accept SWP's offer, and JRI's withdrawal of its bid) removed the immediate need for the scheduled hearing, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2007 Comp Trib 15
- Parties
- Applicant: Commissioner of Competition; Respondent: Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.; Respondent: James Richardson International Limited; Respondent: 6362681 Canada Ltd.; Respondent: 6362699 Canada Ltd.; Intervenor: Canadian Pacific Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian National Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian Wheat Board; Intervenor: Vancouver Port Authority
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Mergers Interim Order / Scheduling Stage; Order Rescinding Scheduling Order; Matter Held in Abeyance
- Outcome
- Scheduling Order of April 30, 2007 rescinded; matter held in abeyance pending further information from counsel.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Order, Joint Venture Dissolution, Scheduling Order, Consent Agreement
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Competition
Applicant
Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.
Respondent
James Richardson International Limited
Respondent
6362681 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
6362699 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian National Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian Wheat Board
Intervenor
Vancouver Port Authority
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Mergers Interim Order / Scheduling Stage; Order Rescinding Scheduling Order; Matter Held in Abeyance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Scheduling Order of April 30, 2007 should be rescinded
- 2 Whether the matter should be held in abeyance given the consent agreement and takeover developments
- 3 Whether a hearing to dissolve the joint venture remains necessary in light of proposed termination under the consent agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal rescinded the Scheduling Order because intervening commercial and procedural developments (the consent agreement envisioning termination of the joint venture, AU board recommendation to accept SWP's offer, and JRI's withdrawal of its bid) removed the immediate need for the scheduled hearing, and the parties supported the rescission; the matter is therefore held in abeyance pending any further steps by counsel.
Court Disposition
Scheduling Order of April 30, 2007 rescinded; matter held in abeyance pending further information from counsel.
Orders
- The Scheduling Order of April 30, 2007, is hereby rescinded.
- This matter will be held in abeyance until counsel for the Commissioner, JRI or SWP provides information indicating that further steps are necessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment