Saskatchewan Wheat Pool and JRI - Order setting March 8, 2007 as date for next teleconference
The Tribunal scheduled a further teleconference to determine whether a further adjournment is appropriate and directed parties to file submissions addressing the implications of subsection 9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act prior to that teleconference, thereby exercising its case management authority under the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2007 Comp Trib 2
- Parties
- Applicant: Commissioner of Competition; Respondent: Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.; Respondent: James Richardson International Limited; Respondent: 6362681 Canada Ltd.; Respondent: 6362699 Canada Ltd.; Intervenor: Canadian Pacific Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian National Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian Wheat Board; Intervenor: Vancouver Port Authority
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Order (mergers) / Case Management Conference (teleconference Scheduling)
- Outcome
- Teleconference scheduled; parties directed to address potential adjournment and to file submissions pursuant to Tribunal directions.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Order, Joint Venture Dissolution, Port Terminal Grain Handling
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Competition
Applicant
Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.
Respondent
James Richardson International Limited
Respondent
6362681 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
6362699 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian National Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian Wheat Board
Intervenor
Vancouver Port Authority
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Interim Order (mergers) / Case Management Conference (teleconference Scheduling)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal should dissolve the grain handling joint venture under section 92 of the Competition Act
- 2 Whether a further adjournment is appropriate in light of subsection 9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal scheduled a further teleconference to determine whether a further adjournment is appropriate and directed parties to file submissions addressing the implications of subsection 9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act prior to that teleconference, thereby exercising its case management authority under the Competition Act.
Court Disposition
Teleconference scheduled; parties directed to address potential adjournment and to file submissions pursuant to Tribunal directions.
Orders
- A teleconference will be held on March 8, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. (EST).
- Parties must address whether a further adjournment is appropriate in light of subsection 9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment