Saskatchewan Wheat Pool and JRI - Order granting the Vancouver Port Authority leave to intervene
The Tribunal granted the VPA leave to intervene because it demonstrated a relevant interest and the parties did not oppose; the Tribunal limited the scope of intervention and imposed conditions to prevent repetitive evidence and to protect confidentiality while allowing the VPA to address the specific Topic on effects of the Joint Venture on the VPA and rail traffic at the Port.
- Citation
- 2006 Comp Trib 12
- Parties
- Applicant: Commissioner of Competition; Respondent: Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.; Respondent: James Richardson International Limited; Respondent: 6362681 Canada Ltd.; Respondent: 6362699 Canada Ltd.; Intervenor: Canadian Pacific Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian National Railway Company; Intervenor: Canadian Wheat Board; Applicant for Leave to Intervene: Vancouver Port Authority
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Order (mergers) / Leave to Intervene Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to intervene granted to the Vancouver Port Authority subject to specified terms and limitations.
- Legal Topics
- Intervention, Interim Order, Joint Venture Dissolution, Port Operations, Rail Traffic Impact
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Competition
Applicant
Saskatchewan Wheat Pool Inc.
Respondent
James Richardson International Limited
Respondent
6362681 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
6362699 Canada Ltd.
Respondent
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian National Railway Company
Intervenor
Canadian Wheat Board
Intervenor
Vancouver Port Authority
Applicant for Leave to Intervene
Procedural Posture
Interim Order (mergers) / Leave to Intervene Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Vancouver Port Authority should be granted leave to intervene in proceedings under s.92 of the Competition Act
- 2 Appropriate scope and limits of the VPA's participation including access to discovery, calling witnesses and expert evidence
- 3 Protection of confidential materials while permitting meaningful intervention
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal granted the VPA leave to intervene because it demonstrated a relevant interest and the parties did not oppose; the Tribunal limited the scope of intervention and imposed conditions to prevent repetitive evidence and to protect confidentiality while allowing the VPA to address the specific Topic on effects of the Joint Venture on the VPA and rail traffic at the Port.
Court Disposition
Leave to intervene granted to the Vancouver Port Authority subject to specified terms and limitations.
Orders
- VPA granted leave to intervene on the Topic: effects anticipated to result from the Joint Venture on the VPA including any effects on rail traffic into and out of the grain handling facilities at the Port.
- VPA may review discovery transcripts and productions subject to confidentiality orders but shall not participate in the discovery process or attend discoveries.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment